Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
The Cornell Daily Sun

Fine Print

ROGERS | No More Parties in … London?

Reading time: about 6 minutes

Wireless Festival is one of the largest music events in the United Kingdom. The London-based festival features some of the biggest names in rap and hip hop every year. On March 30, it was announced that Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, would be the three-day headliner of the festival at Finsbury Park. This would mark his first United Kingdom performance in 11 years, since he attracted controversy as the Glastonbury Festival headliner, where he sparked outrage for not being a rock performer at the traditionally rock festival. This led to a petition that received over 130,000 signatures to remove Ye from the headlining slot, but he proceeded with his performance. 

Similar to Glastonbury, controversy had befallen Ye after his selection for the Wireless Festival, although for completely different reasons. Due to his antisemitic and racist tirades in recent years, many were appalled that Ye would be allowed one of the largest musical platforms the country has. In the days following his announcement, Pepsi, the festival's lead sponsor, said it would withdraw its sponsorship this year, with Ye as the headliner. More companies followed suit, as Diageo, Rockstar and PayPal all rescinded their sponsorships of Wireless. 

The most damning news for the festival and Ye came on April 7, as the Home Office and U.K. authorities denied the artist's Electronic Travel Authorization, making him unable to perform at Wireless. The United Kingdom cited that Ye’s travel to their country was “... not conducive to the public good.” The festival even drew the attention of the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, who released a statement saying, “Kanye West should never have been invited to headline Wireless.” Following Ye’s barring of entry to the United Kingdom, Wireless Festival announced it had canceled its entire event this year and would issue refunds.

Of all performers in the music industry, Ye would understand more than most about being barred from performing in specific countries. Following his release of antisemitic songs in 2025, the rapper had his Australian visas revoked. Additionally, Ye allegedly has a ‘soft ban’ from performing at most venues in the United States. A soft ban, which was in effect until only recently, when Ye performed back-to-back sold-out shows at Sofi Stadium in Los Angeles. As a result of his inability to perform in the aforementioned countries, much of Ye’s recent performances have been in South Korea, China and Mexico. 

Wireless’s choice to have Ye as their festival headliner was poor. Considering his history of hate comments, regardless of recent attempts to revitalize his image, he should never have been selected to have such a platform. Wireless states that multiple stakeholders were consulted prior to the announcement of Ye as headliner and “no concerns were highlighted at the time.” Despite this, the selection remains mostly baffling.

Ye recently released his studio album Bully in late March, with the album being a step in the right direction and away from his hateful lyricism in recent years. Wireless selecting Ye as their headliner is clearly an attempt to profit from Ye’s new album. Bully is not a return to form at all; however, it is closer to older Kanye West than it is to the newer Ye. This makes people accept the album as better than it truly is, since it is showing improvement. Wireless Festival knows this and hopes to ride the wave that Ye has been on since his January apology and album release in March. However, the festival should have considered the optics of selecting an individual so recently removed from rampant hate speech and mental health crises. The mindset of all press being good press is incredibly dangerous. The festival operated under the assumption that both the support and outcry for Ye as the headliner would contribute to Wireless being in the news more, however, no true repercussions would come of it. 

The United Kingdom government’s decision to bar Ye’s entry only stirs up more controversy. Following Ye’s selection as headliner, numerous Jewish communities in the United Kingdom offered to speak to the rapper, on the condition that he would step down as the headliner of Wireless. In response, Ye said, “I would be grateful for the opportunity to meet with members of the Jewish community in the U.K. in person, to listen." However, he made no mention of removing himself from the Wireless setlist, saying he only wanted to present change by coming to London. 

Numerous government officials and leaders in the United Kingdom attempted to contact Wireless Festival, imploring them to reconsider having Ye at their event. However, Wireless did not field any of these calls, forcing the United Kingdom government to reject Ye’s application. The actions here from Wireless are disturbing because the festival is clearly not ignorant. Wireless knew who Ye was and the controversy surrounding him. Saying that “no concerns were highlighted at that time …” is highly unlikely. 

With recent apologies, album releases and Ye’s continued cultural relevance despite his hate speech, the festival hoped this would outweigh the controversies. The festival knew they would be criticized for the decision, but they took the risk that nothing serious would come of it. What Wireless did not account for in their risk assessment was institutions and sponsors taking action against the festival. 

The sponsors' decision to withdraw and the U.K. authorities' intervention were a drastic oversight by those at Wireless. The current state of the music industry will allow those who continue to contribute to pop culture to have a platform despite their controversies. Wireless made a bad bet, hoping to profit from attention, and in return, they may cease to exist. The festival assumed that Ye’s relevance would make him untouchable, and while Ye will continue on, Wireless seems to have forgotten that they themselves are not untouchable. 

‘Fine Print’ is a column analyzing how business and legal forces impact our enjoyment of arts and entertainment.


Brayden Rogers

Brayden Rogers is a member of the Class of 2028 in the College of Arts and Sciences. He is a columnist for the Arts & Culture department and can be reached at brogers@cornellsun.com.


Read More