We have been debating program houses since their inception. What are we actually arguing about?
Proponents of program houses, including fellow columnist Navid Farnia ’09, have argued that they allow students to “reaffirm cultural unity and identity” amidst, in Farnia’s words, a normative “white” culture. They believe that the reevaluation of Ujamaa, Akwe:kon and the Latino Living Center reflects a widespread desire to forcibly assimilate “distinct” students into the general culture.
Opponents, on the other hand, criticize these houses for promoting a “self-segregation” counter to the very concept of the University.